chicken pox --- treatment

Because chicken pox is usually a benign self-limited disease, treatment is typically aimed at treating symptoms and making the patient more comfortable. In some cases, the antiviral medication acyclovir may be used to treat chicken pox.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Acetaminophen
Patients with chicken pox typically have viral-type, prodromal symptoms such as headache, fever, fatigue, and muscle aches. These symptoms can be treated with acetaminophen (Tylenol) with doses determined by the weight of the patient. Children should never be given aspirin or medications containing aspirin for chicken pox or any other viral illness because of the risk of Reye's syndrome.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Soothing Baths
Frequent baths are sometimes helpful to relieve itching. Adding finely-ground (colloidal) oatmeal such as Aveeno can help improve itching. Oatmeal baths can be prepared at home also by grinding or blending dry oatmeal into a fine powder and adding about 2 cups to the bath water. One-half to one cup of baking soda may also be added to bath water to reduce itching.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Lotions
The most common lotion used for chicken pox is Calamine lotion. This or any similar over-the-counter preparation can be applied to the blisters to help dry them out and soothe the skin.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Antihistamines
Over-the-counter and prescription antihistamines may be used to control severe itching.Diphenhydramine (Benadryl) is available over-the-counter and hydroxyzine (Atarax) is available by prescription. Both of these antihistamines cause drowsiness and may be helpful at night to help the patient sleep. The newer antihistamines such as loratadine (Claritin), certrizine (Zyrtec), and fexofenadine (Allegra) can be used to control itching but do not cause drowsiness.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Preventing Scratching
Scratching increases the risk of secondary bacterial infections. All patients with chicken pox should have their nails trimmed short. In addition, small children may have to wear mittens to reduce scratching.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Acyclovir
Acyclovir (Zovirax) is an anti-viral drug that may be used to treat chicken pox. In uncomplicated cases acyclovir taken 5 times a day has been shown to cause shorter periods of new lesion formation, fewer lesions, and more rapid healing but only if started within 24 to 48 hours of the onset of the rash. Acyclovir has not been shown to decrease the rate of complications in otherwise healthy children who get chicken pox. Oral acyclovir is more strongly recommended for children with underlying skin disease such as eczema, newborns, adults, and smokers since this group is at greater risk for complications. IV acyclovir is used for people with compromised immune systems.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Other Anti-Virals
Currently acyclovir (Zovirax) is the only FDA-approved treatment for chicken pox. However, the antiviral medications valacyclovir (Valtrex) and, used to treat herpes simplex virus infections, have been shown to be effective for chicken pox and are often prescribe

chicken pox --- treatment

Because chicken pox is usually a benign self-limited disease, treatment is typically aimed at treating symptoms and making the patient more comfortable. In some cases, the antiviral medication acyclovir may be used to treat chicken pox.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Acetaminophen
Patients with chicken pox typically have viral-type, prodromal symptoms such as headache, fever, fatigue, and muscle aches. These symptoms can be treated with acetaminophen (Tylenol) with doses determined by the weight of the patient. Children should never be given aspirin or medications containing aspirin for chicken pox or any other viral illness because of the risk of Reye's syndrome.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Soothing Baths
Frequent baths are sometimes helpful to relieve itching. Adding finely-ground (colloidal) oatmeal such as Aveeno can help improve itching. Oatmeal baths can be prepared at home also by grinding or blending dry oatmeal into a fine powder and adding about 2 cups to the bath water. One-half to one cup of baking soda may also be added to bath water to reduce itching.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Lotions
The most common lotion used for chicken pox is Calamine lotion. This or any similar over-the-counter preparation can be applied to the blisters to help dry them out and soothe the skin.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Antihistamines
Over-the-counter and prescription antihistamines may be used to control severe itching.Diphenhydramine (Benadryl) is available over-the-counter and hydroxyzine (Atarax) is available by prescription. Both of these antihistamines cause drowsiness and may be helpful at night to help the patient sleep. The newer antihistamines such as loratadine (Claritin), certrizine (Zyrtec), and fexofenadine (Allegra) can be used to control itching but do not cause drowsiness.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Preventing Scratching
Scratching increases the risk of secondary bacterial infections. All patients with chicken pox should have their nails trimmed short. In addition, small children may have to wear mittens to reduce scratching.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Acyclovir
Acyclovir (Zovirax) is an anti-viral drug that may be used to treat chicken pox. In uncomplicated cases acyclovir taken 5 times a day has been shown to cause shorter periods of new lesion formation, fewer lesions, and more rapid healing but only if started within 24 to 48 hours of the onset of the rash. Acyclovir has not been shown to decrease the rate of complications in otherwise healthy children who get chicken pox. Oral acyclovir is more strongly recommended for children with underlying skin disease such as eczema, newborns, adults, and smokers since this group is at greater risk for complications. IV acyclovir is used for people with compromised immune systems.

Chicken Pox Treatment - Other Anti-Virals
Currently acyclovir (Zovirax) is the only FDA-approved treatment for chicken pox. However, the antiviral medications valacyclovir (Valtrex) and, used to treat herpes simplex virus infections, have been shown to be effective for chicken pox and are often prescribe

Cushing’s Disease: How to Recognize and Cure

Julius July, MD, MHS; Eka Julianta Wahjoepramono, MD

Cushing’s disease was first described as ‘polyglandular syndrome’ by Harvey Cushing in 1932.1 He called the condition ‘pituitary basophilism’. It represents the chronic exposure of tissue to increased plasma cortisol and causes a group of symptoms and signs that is called Cushing’s syndrome. Cushing’s syndrome is generally defined as pathological hypercortisolaemia. There are several conditions that can cause this syndrome, including pituitary adenoma (Cushing’s disease), ectopic ACTH secretion, adrenal tumours, ectopic secretion of corticotrophin- releasing hormone, severe depression and chronic glucocorticoid treatment. Ideally, the physician should be able to determine the primary cause of the Cushing’s syndrome. Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis Normally the hypothalamus will produce and secrete a 41-amino acid peptide, called corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH). The paraventricular nucleus is the major location that regulates and secretes CRH.2 The CRH released enters the portal hypophyseal system, reaches the corticotroph cells at the anterior pituitary gland and binds to specific receptors. The ACTH then released is regulated by pulses of CRH secretion. In normal subjects, there are 12 to 40 pulses of ACTH secretion per day. The normal circadian rhythm is produced by the changing amplitude, but not frequency, of ACTH secretion.3 The ACTH itself is a 39-amino acid peptide product of enzymatic cleavage of a larger pro-hormone, called pro-opiomelanocortin. The ACTH enters the circulation and reaches the zona fascicularis of the adrenal gland, where it stimulates the release of cortisol. Cortisol has widespread actions involving the metabolism of carbohydrate, protein and lipid. It also influences most organ systems, including the cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, nervous and immune systems.4 Plasma ACTH and cortisol levels reach the highest point at the time of waking in the morning, between 6 am and 9 am, then decline during the day, with the lowest point being an hour or two after beginning sleep.3 Pathophysiology of Cushing’s Disease The pituitary adenoma that causes Cushing’s disease is typically a microadenoma, smaller than 1 cm at its largest diameter. This microadenoma typically retains negative feedback by glucocorticoids, but it is set at a higher threshold for suppression. Regular doses of glucocorticoid cannot suppress ACTH production, but at higher doses the negative feedback will suppress ACTH production. This microadenoma also retains the expression of CRH receptors and the cellular process necessary to respond to CRH. Excessive production of ACTH by tumour cells leads to overproduction of cortisol by the adrenal cortex. The excessive ACTH will disrupt the normal cortisol rhythm, resulting in sustained hypercortisolaemia. (Figure 1) It is the excessive cortisol that causes the clinical manifestations of Cushing’s disease. Clinical Presentation Almost all organ systems are affected by hypercortisolism, but the effects are not similar in all patients. Patients with Cushing’s syndrome usually have truncal obesity, with increased fat deposition over the abdomen and the dorsal cervical area—also known as a buffalo hump. (Figure 2) Abdominal fat deposition is associated with purple striae (stretch marks). Other features are ‘moon facies’, hirsutism, decreased fat in the limbs, thin skin and a bruising tendency, especially on the arm and hand. (Figure 3) The moon facies is caused by fat deposition in the cheeks and beneath the chin, which round out the face. Commonly, patients also have mood or psychiatric disorders such as depression. Other more general features include muscle weakness, hypertension and diabetes. Osteoporosis is caused by inhibition of calcium absorption and bone matrix formation by cortisol,5 with 25% to 40% of patients having pathological vertebral or rib fractures.6 Children with Cushing’s syndrome generally show a combination of obesity and growth arrest.7 Diagnostic Approach Endocrine evaluation is the key to diagnosis in Cushing’s disease. Imaging studies help to localize the tumour, though sometimes the microadenoma is difficult to locate by imaging. The purpose of endocrine evaluation for Cushing’s syndrome is to establish the presence of hypercortisolaemia and the differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. Establishing the Presence of Cushing’s Syndrome Establishing the presence of hypercortisolism can be done in several ways, such as measurement of plasma cortisol from 6 am to 8 am and from 11 pm to 1 am; measurement of 24-hour urine-free cortisol (UFC); and 24-hour urine 17-hydroxy corticosteroids/ gm of urinary creatinine. It is also necessary to perform a low-dose (1 mg) overnight dexamethasone suppression test to assess the resistance of negative feedback. It is not necessary to perform all the tests if one already shows a significantly abnormal result. More than one test is required only when the results are doubtful and more information needs to be gathered to establish the diagnosis. Measurement of plasma cortisol is used in those above 3 years old, once the HPA axis is well established and the cortisol rhythm has become cyclic. Hypercortisolism is present when the level of evening cortisol is higher than 50% of the morning level. A UFC that is higher than 100 mg/ day confirms the presence of hypercortisolism. Daily UFC measurement is a very simple, cost-effective and accurate assessment to confirm the presence of hypercortisolism. False negatives of UFC after three measurements are rare, except in stress and chronic alcoholism. If the UFC level is not elevated above normal on repeat testing, at least two additional measurements should be made.8 Some obese patients with a body mass index >30 kg/m2 may have normal UFC. However, urine 17-hydroxy corticosteroid (OHCS), a metabolite derived from cortisol, may show elevation. To measure OHCS, 0.5 mg dexamethasone should be given orally every 6 hours for 2 days, starting at 6 am; 24-hour urine collections are obtained prior to dexamethasone administration and on the second day of dexamethasone administration. Normally, OHCS is less than 4 mg per 24 hours, whereas 95% of patients with Cushing’s syndrome will have higher OHCS.9 This test is not necessary for obese patients with significantly abnormal UFC. The low-dose overnight dexamethasone suppression test is done by using 1 mg dexamethasone given orally at 11 pm, and drawing serum cortisol the next day at 8 am. If cortisol <5 μg/dL is considered normal, 5 to 10 μg/dL is considered borderline, and retesting is necessary; >10 μg/dL suggests hypercortisolaemia.10 Establishing a Differential Diagnosis of Cushing’s Syndrome Patients with excess cortisol secretion in the outpatient testing should be hospitalized for further evaluation. To differentiate Cushing’s disease from ectopic ACTH production and adrenal tumours, it is necessary to: Measure serum ACTH (usually low in adrenal tumours). Perform an abdominal CT to rule out an adrenal tumour. Carry out a high-dose dexamethasone suppression test; one-fifth of Cushing’s disease cases are not suppressed with high-dose dexamethasone. Perform an overnight dexamethasone test: obtain a baseline 8 am plasma cortisol level, then give dexamethasone 8 mg orally at 11 pm and measure the plasma cortisol level the next morning at 8 am. In 95% of patients with Cushing’s disease, plasma cortisol levels are reduced to <50% of baseline, whereas in ectopic ACTH or adrenal tumours, it is usually unchanged.11 Metyrapone test: Give metyrapone 750 mg orally every 4 hours for 6 doses. Most patients with Cushing’s disease will have an OHCS rise in the urine of 70% above baseline, or increased serum 11-deoxycortisol 400-fold above baseline.11 CRH test: Patients with Cushing’s disease will usually respond to exogenous CRH 0.1 μg/kg intravenous bolus with even further increased plasma ACTH and cortisol levels. Ectopic ACTH and adrenal tumours do not respond to exogenous CRH.12 Inferior petrosal sinus sampling could help determine the likely side of the microadenoma within the pituitary. Fairly commonly, the adenoma cannot be seen on an MRI of the pituitary gland. Not all the above tests are required for every case. If the MRI does not show any pituitary abnormality, then we need to perform two or more tests to rule out ectopic production of ACTH. Cushing’s disease with normal MRI requires inferior petrosal sinus sampling before undergoing pituitary adenomectomy. Imaging A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan focusing on the sellar region is the procedure of choice for detecting and localizing the pituitary adenoma. The MRI should be performed with and without contrast. Usually the pituitary adenoma will show less enhancement compared with the normal gland. Commonly, the microadenoma is so small that it is not clearly defined on MRI. Recently, the spoiled gradient recalled acquisition technique, using 1 mm non-overlapping cuts, has shown greater sensitivity than the conventional spin echo approach (sensitivity 80% vs 49%).13 However, the incidence of false positives was higher (4% vs 2%). Computed tomography (CT) scanning is sometimes used for patients with contraindications for MRI, such as in those with a pacemaker. A CT scan is far less sensitive than an MRI, but can still provide some detailed information such as aeration of the sphenoid, location of the carotid arteries, supra or parasellar extension if present, and location of any coexisting abnormality. Treatment Surgery Transphenoidal microsurgical resection of the pituitary adenoma is the treatment of choice for Cushing’s disease. Adenomectomy should be directed according to MRI findings of whether the adenoma is on the left or right anterior lobe of the pituitary gland. Sometimes the adenoma is so small that it is not detected by MRI. A majority of Cushing’s disease with negative MRI will show lateralization from inferior petrosal sinus sampling, which should be use as guidance during pituitary adenomectomy. If it is doubtful intraoperatively, then careful complete bilateral exposure of the gland is necessary to identify the adenoma. Usually the adenoma is greywhite or grey-yellow in colour. The long-standing hypercortisolism feedback suppresses the hypothalamic CRH-producing cells and the secretion of ACTH by normal corticotroph cells, but does not suppress the ACTH secretion by tumour cells. The HPA axis takes several months to recover after surgery; in the mean time, glucocorticoid replacement treatment is required for 6 months to 2 years for hypocortisolism. Figure 4 shows a patient waiting for the hypothalamic neurons to recover, the normal pituitary corticotroph cells to function, appropriate stimulation of the adrenal gland and a return to normal endogenous circadian cortisol secretion. The cure rate for microadenoma with surgery is higher (85%) compared with that of larger tumours.11 If the initial surgery fails, reassessment with more complete laboratory work is necessary, and sometimes a second surgery should be offered especially for younger patients to avoid early radiation. If the second surgery also fails, then other options of treatment should be initiated. Radiation therapy Fractionated radiation of the sella after failed transphenoidal surgery can achieve biochemical remission in 80% of patients in 4 years.14 The effect of radiation takes place in a delayed fashion, from 6 months to years; medical therapy is, therefore, used to reduce adrenal production of glucocorticoids in the interim. Hypopituitarism is an anticipated side effect of radiation, usually occuring 5 to 10 years afterwards. Other disadvantages are injuries to the optic chiasm, induction of secondary neoplasm over the long term and occulomotor neuropathy. Medical therapy Ketoconazole can block cortisol production by the adrenal cortex.15 It can induce remission of the signs and symptoms of Cushing’s disease whilst the patient awaits transphenoidal surgery or, more commonly, the effects of sella radiation. Its use is limited primarily by liver toxicity. Adrenalectomy Bilateral adrenalectomy is limited to those patients in whom other treatments have failed. The problem with this procedure is the risk of developing Nelson’s syndrome, which occurs in 10% to 20% of patients after adrenalectomy for Cushing’s disease.16 In Cushing’s disease, ACTH is suppressed by negative feedback from the hypercortisolism, although ACTH secretion by tumour cells is not suppressed. After bilateral adrenalectomy, the ACTH level increases greatly, and some adenomata dramatically enlarge after correction of hypercortisolism. Nelson’s syndrome presents with hyperpigmentation associated with unbridled production of pro-opiomelanocortin, high levels of ACTH and melatonin-stimulating hormone, together with rapid growth of the pituitary adenoma. References 1. Cushing H. The basophil adenomas of the pituitary body and their clinical manifestations (pituitary basophilism). Bull John Hopkins Hosp 1932;50:137–195. 2. Vale W, Spiess J, Rivier C, et al. Characterization of a 41-residue ovine hypothalamic peptide that stimulates secretion of corticotrophin and beta-endorphine. Science 1981;213:1394–1397. 3. Veldhuis JD, Iranmanesh A, Johnson ML, Lizzaralde G. Twenty-four-hour rhythms in plasma concentrations of adrenohypophyseal hormones are generated by distinct amplitude and/or frequency modulation of underlying pituitary secretory bursts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;71:1616–1623. 4. Loriaux DL, Cutler GB Jr. Diseases of the adrenal glands. In: Kohler PO, ed. Clinical Endocrinology. New York, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1986:167–238. 5. Meunier PJ, Dempster DW, Edouard C, Chapuy MC, Arlot M, Charhon S. Bone histomorphometry in corticosteroidinduced osteoporosis and Cushing’s syndrome. Adv Exp Med Biol 1984;171:191–200. 6. Ross EJ, Marshall JP, Friedman M. Cushing’s syndrome: diagnostic criteria. Q J Med 1966;35:149–192. 7. Styne DM, Grumbach MM, Kaplan SL, Wilson CB, Conte FA. Treatment of Cushing’s disease in childhood and adolescence by transphenoidal microadenomectomy. New Engl J Med 1984;310:889–893. 8. Watts NB. Cushing’s syndrome: an update. Contemp Neurosurg 1995;17(18):1–7. 9. Yanovski JA, Cutler GB, Chrousos GP, et al. Corticotropin- Releasing Hormone Stimulation Following Low Dose Dexamethasone Administration: A new test to distinguish Cushing’s syndrome from Pseudo-Cushing’s states. JAMA 1993;269:2232–2238. 10. Tyrell JB, Aron DC, Forsham PH. Glucocorticoids and Adrenal Androgens. In: Greenspan FS, ed. Basic and Clinical Endocrinology. 3rd ed. Norwalk, Conn: Appleton & Lange; 1991:323-362. 11. Greenberg MS. Handbook of Neurosurgery. 5th ed. New York, US: Thieme; 2001;421-436. 12. Chrousos GP, Schulte HM, Oldfield EH, et al. The Corticotrophin-Releasing Factor Stimulation Test: an aid in the evaluation of patients with Cushing’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 1984;310:622–626. A complete list of references can be obtained upon request to the editor. About the Authors Dr July is Head of the Department of Neurosurgery at the Medical School of Universitas Pelita Harapan, and Staff Neurosurgeon at Siloam Hospital Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang, Indonesia. Dr Wahjoepramono is Dean of the Medical School of Universitas Pelita Harapan, and Chairman of Neurosurgical Service at Siloam Hospital Lippo Karawaci. E-mail: juliusjuly@yahoo.com

saheli

Saheli – The non hormonal contraceptive (Weekly oral contraceptive pill)

Central drug Research Institute (CDRI), Lucknow has developed the molecule ‘Centchroman’ which was marketed by HLL under the brand name Saheli. Introduced in 1991, Saheli has the unique distinction of being the world’s first non-steroidal oral contraceptive pill. It is also unique since it is an indigenously developed drug – the first of its kind. For being non –steroidal, Saheli does not have the short term side effects like nausea, vomiting, weight gain etc. which are commonly reported with the other oral contraceptive pills. The only side effects reported with Saheli (Centchroman) is the delay in the menstrual cycles in around 8% of the cases. Besides its use as a safe contraceptive for long term use, Saheli is also shown to be beneficial for treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding, osteoporosis and pre-menstrual syndrome and as a drug for lowering lipid levels in the blood.

Composition: Each tablet contains centchroman 30 mg

Active Ingredient: Ormeloxifene is a SERM, or selective estrogen receptor modulator. In some parts of the body, its action is estrogenic (e.g, bones), in other parts of the body, its action is anti-estrogenic (e.g., uterus, breasts. It causes an asynchrony in the menstrual cycle between ovulation and the development of the uterine lining, although its exact mode of action is not well defined. In clinical trials, it caused ovulation to occur later than it normally would in some women (Singh 2001), but did not affect ovulation in the majority of women, while causing the lining of the uterus to build more slowly. It speeds the transport of any fertilized egg through the fallopian tubes more quickly than is normal (Singh 2001). Presumably, this combination of effects creates an environment such that if fertilization occurs, implantation will not be possible.

Mechanism of Action: The molecule centchroman offers a unique combination of weak estrogenic and potent anti estrogenic properties. Due to this subtle mix of estrogenic and anti estrogenic action it inhibits the fertilized ovum from nidation and thus prevents pregnancy, but at the same time, it does not appear to disturb the other estrogen effects. Use of Saheli (Centchroman) as a contraceptive has been extensively evaluated in more than 2000 women of the reproductive age groups who wanted to space their children. Intensive monitoring by clinical examination, hematology and biochemical tests as well as laparoscopy and ultra sonographic examinations of ovaries and uterus have shown the drug to be quite safe. Babies born to use failure cases have shown normal milestones. The contraceptive effect is readily reversible and subsequent pregnancy and its outcome is normal. It scores over steroidal contraceptive pills because it does not disturb the endocrine system and the normal ovulatory cycle is maintained.

Dosage: This pill is to be taken twice a week on fixed days for the first three months, followed by one pill in a week thereafter. The main USP of the product is about the complete freedom from the side effects with the ease and convenience of the dosage. Moreover, Saheli does not cause nausea, vomiting, dizziness and break through bleeding and has no adverse effect on lipid profile and platelet function as is seen with steroidal contraceptives.

Target audience for Saheli is literate women in the age group of 20-45 years.

Price: Saheli is priced at Rs.16/- for a cycle of 8 pills.

Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea: new rules for an old game

Keywords : Clostridium difficile, antibiotic associated diarrhoea

Prashant Verma, Govind K Makharia Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, India Corresponding Author: Dr. Govind K Makharia Email: govindmakharia@aiims.ac.in Abstract C.difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) is now considered to be one of the commonest causes of nosocomial diarrhea. CDAD, once considered to be a “nuisance” disease, has lately become a “killer” disease with appearance of a hypervirulent strain, toxinotype III. Although the incidence and severity of CDAD have increased in the western world especially in health care settings; it still is under-recognized in India and Asia. Any episode of diarrhea with fever and leucocytosis in a patient on some antibiotics in a health care setting is strong pointer towards presence of CDAD. Clinical suspicion is usually confirmed by ELISA based C. difficile toxin assays in the stool sample. The aim of therapy is to restore normal colonic microflora, resulting in the elimination of C. difficile. Treatment of C.difficile needs to be individualized depending on the severity of the disease and patient characteristics. Majority of patients will require antibiotic therapy and, whenever possible, discontinuation of the predisposing antibiotics. Metronidazole and vancomycin are the mainstay of the treatment of CDAD, as both these agents are highly active against all strains of pathogenic C.difficile. Neither of these drugs is however effective for the carrier state of C. difficile. Approximately 15%-30% of patients experience a symptomatic recurrence after  discontinuation of antibiotics. Control of health care associated CDAD involves a range of primarily preventive measures including proper hand hygiene, use of personal protective equipment, environmental decontamination, isolation or cohort nursing and adequate treatment of CDAD cases. Introduction Humanity’s battle against infectious diseases has continued since time immemorial. This tug of war between infective microorganisms and mankind has reached a stage where stakes are high and options for us are limited. Development of resistant micro-organisms and broad spectrum antibiotics used to treat them has further complicated the issue. It has led to resurgence of hospital acquired infections like Clostridium difficile which have considerable morbidity and mortality. Therefore, current strategies should focus on prevention rather than cure. Bacillus difficilis, an apparently innocuous organism, was isolated in 1935 from the fecal flora of healthy neonates.[1] Forty years later, it was renamed as Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) and identified as the cause of 15-20% of antibiotic–associated diarrhea (AAD) and all cases of pseudomembranous colitis  (PMC).[2] It colonizes 3% of healthy adults[3], 20% hospitalized patients[4,5] and 25-80% of infants.[6] C.difficile is a Gram-positive, anaerobic spore-forming bacillus. C. difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) was initially considered a “nuisance” disease as symptoms were mild, specific treatment was not always necessary (i.e. stopping antibiotic worked alone), treatmentwas cheap, sequelae were rare and usually not severe. Therefore, compared to other nosocomial diseases, this infection did not receive enough attention from researchers. This “nuisance” disease has lately become a “killer” disease with relatively higher mortality and morbidity. What is the current knowledge? CDAD is now considered to be the commonest cause of nosocomial diarrhea. Its incidence and severity has dramatically increased since the appearance of a hypervirulent strain in 2000, especially in health care settings. It is estimated that CDAD results in more than 500,000 new cases of nosocomial diarrhea in United States annually, and results in 15,000 deaths per year.[7] It is estimated that each episode of C. difficile associated diarrhea increases 3.6 extra days of hospitalization and additional hospital costs of $3,669 per patient in the United States. Cumulative annual excess hospital healthcare cost due to C. difficile disease is estimated to be $1.1 billion in US.[8] This phenomenon is not confined only to United States; regional outbreaks of CDAD have been reported from world over.[9,10] An outbreak from Quebec in Canada was reported by Pepin et al[9] in which they reviewed 1721 patients with CDAD diagnosed between 1991 and 2003. The incidence of CDAD increased from 35.6 per 100,000 in 1991 to 156.3 per 100,000 in  2003. Moreover, among patients aged 65 years or more, the incidence increased from 102.0 to 866.5 per 100,000. The proportion of cases with CDAD that were complicated increased from 7.1% (12/169) in 1991–1992 to 18.2% (71/390) in 2003 (p < 0.001), and the mortality within 30 days after diagnosis  increased from 4.7% (8/169) in 1991–1992 to 13.8% (54/390) in 2003 (p <0.001).[9] Similarly in England, C. difficile infection was the primary cause of death for 499 patients in 1999; its number rose to 3393 in 2006 and 3875 in 2007.[10] Why there is an increase in the incidence of CDAD? Emergence of hypervirulent strains coupled with indiscriminate use of antimicrobials and inadequate infection control measures in hospitals are primarily responsible factors for recent outbreaks of C. difficile infection. Molecular studies in C. difficile isolates from a number of US and Canadian healthcare centres have identified a more virulent strain of C. difficile. It is characterized as toxinotype III, North American Pulsed Field (NAP) type 1 and PCR-ribotype 027 (all synonymous terms) based on method of detection. This strain carries the binary toxin gene cdtB and an 18-bp deletion in tcdC gene from the pathogenicity locus. The tcdC gene is a putative regulatory gene that down-regulates transcription of tcdA and tcdB which encode toxin A and B, respectively. Deletion in tcdC gene results in loss of negative regulation in production of toxins A and B resulting in their increased production. The change from a relatively less virulent to more virulent isolate of C. difficile was substantiated by McDonald et al.[11] They compared 187 C. difficile isolates collected from outbreaks of CDAD between 2000 and 2003 with historical database of more than 6000 isolates obtained before 2001. BI/ NAP type 1 strain constituted more than 50 percent of isolates in current outbreaks as against only 14 cases in (more than 6000 patients) historical databases. All of the current, but none of the historic BI/NAP type 1 isolates were resistant to gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin (p<0.001).[11] Furthermore, Warny et al showed that peak median toxin A and toxin B concentrations produced in vitro by NAP type 1/027 were 16 and 23 times higher, respectively, than those measured in isolates representing 12 different PFGE types, known as toxinotype O.[12] Subsequently, it was established that that toxinotype III strain is associated with hospital outbreaks of increased disease severity of CDAD and a higher mortality.[13] The distinct changes in the epidemiology of CDAD which have been observed are summarized in the Table 1. Why it is important to us? CDAD is under-recognized in India and Asia, due to lack of clinical suspicion, difficulty in culturing the organism and cost of toxin assay. Prevalence of CDAD is around 2 to 4% in patients without diarrhea and 7 to 30% in patients with diarrhea in different hospital based studies.[18,19,20,21,22,23] The prevalence has not been estimated in the community setting in India. The isolation of C. difficile was first described in 1985, when Gupta and Jadhav[18] isolated it from 25.3% of hospitalized patients with diarrhea and 4.3% of controls admitted for other ailments. Niyogi et al[19] isolated C. difficile in 11% hospitalized patients with diarrhea and 2.9% non-diarrheic controls; 87% isolates produced cytotoxin even though the diarrheic patients had no history of antibiotic use. Bhattacharya et al[20] investigated 233 patients with acute diarrhea and isolated C. difficile as a sole pathogen from 7.3%, of which, 82.4% produced cytotoxin. Vaishnavi et al[21] reported 30% positivity for C. difficile toxin in hospitalized patients of all age groups receiving single to multiple antibiotics for various diseases, but only in 7% of patients not receiving antibiotics. When only adult population were investigated, the positivity for C. difficile toxin was 19.4% in the antibiotic receiving hospitalized patients.[22] In our institution, C. difficile was found to be responsible for 15% of the cases of nosocomial diarrhea in 1999.[23] Majority of C. difficile isolates in India are responsive to metronidazole,[24,25] although there is a possibility that there may be emergence of resistant strains with severe disease manifestations in general practice. The risk factors associated with C.difficile associated diarrhoea are listed in Table 2. How to define and categorize CDAD? A CDAD case is defined as a case of diarrhea (i.e., un-formed stool that conforms to the shape of a specimen collection container) or toxic megacolon (i.e., abnormal dilation of the large intestine documented radiologically) without other known etiology that meets 1 or more of the following criteria: (1) a positive stool sample for C. difficile toxin A and/or B, demonstration of a toxin-producing C. difficile organism in the stool sample by culture or other means; (2) pseudomembranous colitis as seen during endoscopic examination or surgery; and (3) pseudomembranous colitis as seen during histopathological examination.[26] A recurrent CDAD case is defined as an episode of CDAD (i.e., one that meets the criteria for a CDAD case) that occurs 8 weeks or less after the onset of a previous episode, provided that CDAD symptoms from the earlier episode resolved with or without therapy. The recurrent CDAD case definition may be implemented for laboratory-based reporting systems on the basis of the following stipulations: (1) an additional positive result of a laboratory test performed on a specimen collected 2 weeks or less after the last specimen that tested positive represents continuation of the same CDAD case, (2) an additional positive result of a laboratory test performed on a specimen collected 2-8 weeks after the last specimen that tested positive represents a recurrent CDAD case, and (3) an additional positive result of a laboratory test performed on a specimen collected more than 8 weeks after the last specimen that tested positive represents a new CDAD case.[26] A case patient with severe CDAD is defined as a patient who meets any of the following criteria within 30 days after CDAD symptom onset (or, in the case of laboratory-based reporting, within 30 days after the index laboratory test): (1)  history of admission to an intensive care unit for complications associated with CDAD (e.g., for shock that requires vasopressor therapy); (2) history of surgery (e.g., colectomy) for toxic megacolon, perforation, or refractory colitis; and (3) death  caused by CDAD within 30 days after symptom onset (e.g., as listed on the death certificate or recorded in the medical record by a clinician caring for the patient).[26] A health care facility (HCF) is defined as any acute care, long-term care, long term acute care, or other facility in which skilled nursing care is provided and patients are admitted at least overnight. CDAD case patients are further defined by their exposures as follows: A patient is classified as having HCF-onset, HCFassociated CDAD, when the onset of CDAD symptom is more than 48 hours after admission to an HCF. A patient is classified as having community-onset, HCFassociated CDAD when the onset of CDAD symptom starts in the community or 48 hours or less after admission to an HCF, provided that symptom onset was less than 4 weeks after the last discharge from an HCF. A patient is classified as having community-associated CDAD when the onset of the CDAD symptom starts in the community or 48 hours or less after admission to an HCF, provided that symptom onset was more than 12 weeks after the last discharge from an HCF. A patient is classified as having indeterminate CDAD when CDAD symptoms onset does not fit in any of the above criteria for an exposure setting. A patient is classified as having unknown CDAD when the exposure setting cannot be determined because of lack of available data.[26] When to suspect? High index of suspicion is required for the diagnosis of C. difficile, especially when diarrhea occurs in hospital setting. Use of antibiotics complicated by diarrhea, fever, and leucocytosis are strong pointers towards a suspicion of CDAD. Clinical suspicion is usually confirmed by ELISA based toxin assays in stool sample. Other stool based tests have been elaborated in Table 3. Presentation with atypical manifestations may require colonoscopic examination and histological confirmation. There is no definite role of radiological investigations and they are not required unless there is a suspicion of complications such as toxic megacolon. Management The aim of therapy is to restore normal colonic microflora, resulting in the elimination of C. difficile. Patients with mild symptoms can occasionally be managed conservatively by discontinuation of the inciting antibiotic. It is effective in 15 to 25 % patients with no further need of any C. difficile specific antimicrobials.[30,31] However, in most patients anti-C. difficile therapy is required to ameliorate symptoms while allowing gradual restoration of the normal gut flora. Confirmation of diagnosis with fecal toxin assay is essential prior to initiating antibiotic therapy as symptoms of this condition are nonspecific. Initiation of empirical treatment can be considered in acutely ill patients awaiting test result or if there is strong suspicion of C. difficile infection. In most patients, sigmoidoscopic or colonoscopic examination is not required for establishing the diagnosis, as pseudomembranes occur in only half of infected patients, moreover these procedures carry a higher risk of complication including perforation.[32] The specific indications for colonoscopic examinations include a need for early diagnosis of CDAD and stool test is delayed or unavailable; and when other colonic diseases are in differential diagnosis. Antibiotic treatment for initial C. difficile infection Treatment of C. difficile infection needs to be individualized depending on the severity of the disease and patient characteristics. The predictors of severe disease include severe diarrhea, ileus, fever, age more than 60 years, acute renal failure, hypoalbuminemia, ICU stay and pseudomembranes seen on colonoscopy. Majority of patients will require antibiotic therapy and, whenever possible, discontinuation of the predisposing antibiotics. Patients who continue on implicated antibiotics while undergoing treatment of CDAD have a higher likelihood of treatment failure.33 Younger patients with mild symptoms might respond to discontinuation of offending antibiotic and hydration alone. In fact, non use of antibiotic is associated with faster elimination of spores in the carriers of C. difficile. Presence of co-morbidities and features of severe infection calls for antibiotic therapy. Despite initial response rates of >90%;[34,35] 15%–30% of patients have relapse of infection after successful initial therapy, usually in the first few weeks after treatment is discontinued.[2,36] Recurrence may involve re- infection with the initial strain or a new strain. Failure to develop specific antibody response has recently been identified as a critical factor for recurrence of infection.[37] Metronidazole and vancomycin are the mainstay of the treatment of CDAD, as both these agents are highly active against all strains of pathogenic C. difficile. Neither of these drugs is however effective for C. difficile carriage. They also have no role in prevention of C. difficile infection while patients are receiving other antimicrobials.[38] Other antibiotics (bacitracin, teicoplanin, fusidic acid,[39] nitazoxanide[40], rifaximin[41], ramoplanin[42]) have been tried as a single or adjuvant agent in CDAD with variable efficacy. Metronidazole is currently used as first-line therapy because it is cheap, easily available and has reasonable efficacy. The standard initial therapy is 500 mg orally (7.5–15 mg/kg in children) 3 times daily for 14 days, which successfully resolves symptoms in  >90% of patients within 1 week.[34,35] Parenteral or rectaladministration can be used in patients who are unable to take orally and leads to similar systemic and colonic tissue drug levels. Metronidazole preferentially diffuses from the serum and interstitial compartment of the inflamed colon into the  colonic lumen, a property that can increase its efficacy againstC. difficile.[43] The side effects of metronidazole though relatively frequent and unpleasant but are rarely serious and do not require discontinuation in most instances. Anorexia, nausea, metallic taste and abdominal cramps are the most common side effects. Rarely, neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy and seizure may result. The use of metronidazole  should be avoided in neurological diseases, blood dyscrasias,first trimester of pregnancy and in those who are chronic alcoholics. Based on a recent guideline[44] and Cochrane review,[45] oral vancomycin is recommended as first-line therapy in pregnant women, in children younger than 10 years of age, and those with severe infections. Oral vancomycin should also be used for patients where either metronidazole is contraindicated or has failed to show response. It is a tricyclic glycopeptides bactericidal antibiotic active against Gram positive bacteria. It  is administered orally in C. difficile infection. It is not absorbed in the small intestine because of its large molecular weight and reaches the colon intact, an advantage for the treatment of C. difficile. Parenteral vancomycin is not effective as it is not excreted into the colonic lumen. Unfortunately, oral vancomycin is not available in India. The recommended dose to treat C. difficile for the first episode of infection and first recurrence is 125 mg 4 times daily for 10–14 days. As it is not absorbed systemically, side effects such as nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity and red-man syndrome are not seen which otherwise are well known with parenteral vancomycin. Nausea and mild abdominal discomfort are the most common side effects of oral vancomycin and rarely limit treatment. Vancomycin enemas can be used when oral administration is not feasible. Colonoscopic decompression with vancomycin lavage is reported to be useful in one study.[46] Treatment of acute fulminant infection Severe C. difficile colitis tends to occur during the initial infection or first recurrence. It is associated with high morbidity and estimated case–fatality rate is about 2%.[47] The risk factors for development of acute fulminant infection include advanced age, presence of co-morbidities, high total leucocyte count, and lactic acidosis. Patients with toxic megacolon may not have diarrhea. Hemodynamic instability is consistently associated with high rates of mortality.  Medical management of fulminant disease should include administration of both vancomycin orally and metronidazole intravenously. Because of ileus, if oral administration of vancomycin is not possible vancomycin should be administered rectally. Patients not responding to above regimen may require urgent surgical intervention. In patients who are at surgical risk can be given pooled human immunoglobulin (200–500 mg/kg/day) until they improve, although evidence to support its efficacy is lacking.[48] Immediate surgical intervention is indicated for patients with ileus, toxic megacolon, or those having localizing peritoneal signs. Subtotal colectomy is the procedure of choice. Though prompt subtotal colectomy and ileostomy is generally advised, it carries a high (35% to 80%) mortality rate. Hemicolectomy should be avoided as it is associated with higher mortality.[49] Treatment strategy for recurrent C. difficile infection Approximately 15%-30% of patients experience a symptomatic recurrence after discontinuation of antibiotics.[2,36] Approximately half of the recurrent C. difficile infections are caused by repeated ingestion of bacteria (re-infection) before the normal intestinal flora recovers, and half are attributed to incomplete eradication of the original strain during antibiotic treatment (relapse).[50] Older patients and those with a history of prior C. difficile recurrence are at an even higher risk (>50%) Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea 19 for recurrent disease. Most recurrences happen within 2 weeks of stopping therapy, but delayed recurrences have also been documented. The first recurrence can be treated with the same antibiotic, for example a 14-day course of metronidazole (if tolerated) or with supportive care alone, if symptoms are mild. Unfortunately, those who have recurrence of the disease have higher chances (up to 65%) of further recurrences.[51] Management strategies for recurrent C. difficile infection include repeat courses of metronidazole or vancomycin, tapered and pulsed dosing of vancomycin, toxin-binding agents such as cholestyramine, probiotics such as Saccharomyces boulardii, and immunotherapy, but none are supported by randomized large clinical trials. For patients who experience more than one recurrences of symptomatic C. difficile infection, the diagnosis of recurrent C. difficile infection should be confirmed by a stool assay before starting therapy. For confirmed recurrent C. difficile infection, a 6-week pulsed-tapered (125 mg qid × 10-14 d; 125 mg bid × 7 d; 125 mg daily × 7 d; 125 mg once every 2 d × 8 d; and 125 mg once every 3 d × 15 d) course of oral vancomycin therapy can be tried.[52] Pulsed dosing of antibiotics allows remnant C. difficile spores to germinate into antibiotic-sensitive vegetative forms, which are then killed on subsequent day of antibiotic therapy. It also restores colonic microflora while conferring adequate protection against C. difficile.[53] Toxinbinding  resin (colestipol 5 g every 12 hours) may provide additional benefit when added in the later weeks of the antibiotic taper and continued for 4–6 weeks after antibiotic therapy is stopped.[54] Addition of rifaximin (400–800 mg daily) in 2 or 3 divided doses for 2 weeks, immediately after 10–14 days of vancomycin therapy while the patient is still in clinical remission has been found to be an effective strategy for those who have multiple relapses of CDAD.[41] Despite these treatment strategies, if the patient continues to have recurrent CDAD, chronic vancomycin therapy at the lowest effective dose (125 mg daily or every alternate day) can be tried for an indefinite period. Probiotics, immunotherapy, and fecal bacteriotherapy are other options if recurrences are frequent and severe. Probiotics are beneficial bacteria that modulate mucosal and systemic immunity and contribute to microbial equilibrium in human gut. Therefore, they have been advocated for antibiotic associated and CDAD which results from alteration  of normal fecal flora. However, evidence to support routine use of probiotics for CDAD is insufficient and conflicting. A recent Cochrane review failed to demonstrate its efficacy in  treatment of CDAD.[55] Some of the probiotic strains(Saccharomyces boulardii) can be used in recurrent CDAD  either with metronidazole or high dose vancomycin.[56,57] The role of non-toxigenic strain of C. difficile as probiotic therapy was explored in two patients with relapsing C. difficile diarrhea and found to be effective.[58] There are evidences to support role of few probiotic strains (Saccharomyces boulardii, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) in the prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhea, but data on their role in prevention of CDAD is sparse.[59] Fecal bacteriotherapy restores colon homeostasis by reintroducing missing bacterial flora in stool obtained from a healthy donor usually in form of enemas. It is effective (94- 100% success), safe, inexpensive and simple to administer in most hospitals.[60] However potential risk of transmitting infectious organism coupled with medico-legal problems and its esthetically unappealing nature has limited its role in clinical practice. Asymptomatic carriers of C. difficile have been found to have 3 fold higher IgG antitoxin-A antibody compared with symptomatic patients.[61] Patients with higher IgG antitoxin-A antibody response during first episode of C. difficile infection have markedly (48 times) less risk of developing recurrent C. difficile infection than those with low antibody titers.[37] These two evidences are the basic principles for genesis of a new form of therapy for recurrent CDAD. Intravenous infusion of normal pooled human immunoglobulin (IVIG 400 mg/kg body weight) increases serum IgG antitoxin concentrations, therefore IV immunoglobulin has been used with variable success to treat a small number of patients with severe C. difficile colitis. However, IVIG failed to demonstrate any significant differences in mortality, colectomies and length of hospital stay in a retrospective review of 18 patients where it was used.[62] What to do for asymptomatic carriers? Universal precautions should be instituted for all patients in hospital to reduce the nosocomial spread of infection, as asymptomatic carriers act as hidden reservoir for C. difficile. Treatment of asymptomatic carriers is not warranted as it is likely to prolong the carrier state.[63] They are also resistant to acquisition of outbreak-associated strains[64] and no more likely to develop CDAD than those with negative stool cultures.[65,66] Further, data is presently inadequate to show reduction in hospital spread of infection following treatment of asymptomatic carriers.[38] How to prevent C. difficile infection? Prevention of C. difficile infection has two major components: prevention of spread of organism to the patients and b) reduction in likelihood of clinical disease. a) Prevention of spread of organism to the patients It involves proper hand hygiene, use of personal protective equipment, environmental decontamination, isolation or cohort nursing and adequate treatment of CDAD cases. Hand washing is of utmost importance in prevention of hospital acquired infections. Vigilant hand hygiene consists of hand washing with friction for at least 15 seconds.[67] Alcohol based hand gels are highly effective against non-spore forming organisms, but they are not sporicidal. Due to the theoretical advantage of hand washing over alcohol-based hand sanitizers, hand washing with a non-antimicrobial soap or antimicrobial soap and water should be considered after removing gloves in the setting of a CDAD outbreak or if ongoing transmission cannot be controlled by other measures. UK national guidelines recommend healthcare workers to wash their hands before and after contact with patients with suspected or confirmed C. difficile infection. Protective disposable gloves and aprons should be used while handling body fluids and nursing CDAD patients.[68] C. difficile spores can survive in the environment for months or years, and environmental contamination has been linked to the spread of C. difficile infection in healthcare settings. UK national guidelines therefore recommend cleaning of rooms, bed spaces, commodes, toilets and bathrooms of infected patients with chlorine containing cleaning agents or vaporised hydrogen peroxide daily (as they inactivate C. difficile spores). Use of disposable thermometers instead of electronic oral and rectal thermometers is recommended.[68] Isolation or cohorting of patients with CDAD and enteric or contact precautions have been successful in limiting transmission of C. difficile in hospitals.[69,70] However, it is not possible to determine the specific effectiveness of isolation techniques as these measures are instituted as part of other infection control interventions. Surveillance of C. difficile infections should be instituted to identify outbreaks and initiate control measures in a timely fashion. Early identification and treatment of CDAD cases prevent further spread of infection. No treatment is required for the asymptomatic carriers of C. difficile. b) Reduction in likelihood of clinical disease Antimicrobials should be prescribed according to local policies and guidelines for treatment and prophylaxis. Restrictions in the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics have shown to reduce the frequency of CDAD. Prospective observational cohort studies suggest that restricted use of clindamycin and third generation cephalosporins result in fewer cases of C. difficile infection.[71,72] Besides antibiotics, use of has proton pump inhibitors has been associated with C. difficile infection, according to a recent meta-analysis involving 33,193 patients. Therefore, indiscriminate and unwarranted use of proton pump inhibitor(s) should be avoided specially in health care setting.[73] Conclusions The incidence of health care associated CDAD is on the rise with associated increased morbidity and mortality. C. difficile associated diseases are not commonly recognized in many health care settings. Atypical hypervirulent BI/NAP1/027 strain is resistant to flouroquinolones, produces more toxins and carries the gene encoding binary toxin which has led to increased incidence and severity of CDAD. Vancomycin and metronidazole remain the mainstay of treatment for CDAD, but newer investigational therapies hold promise. Control of health care associated CDAD involves a range of primary preventive measures. Learning points ·         Suspect CDAD when diarrhea occurs in appropriate clinical setting (use of antibiotic in the last 2 months or onset of diarrhea within 48 hrs or more after hospitalization). ·         Pay careful attention to the supportive care (such as fluid and electrolyte replacement). ·         Stop prescribing antibiotics if possible, and if not, substitute with a lower risk agent. ·         Use metronidazole for initial treatment of patients with mild or moderate disease, and reserve vancomycin for severe disease. ·         Isolate patients with suspected C. difficile infection, use gowns and gloves when seeing them, and remember to wash hands rather than use alcohol hand rubs. ·         Retreat first-time recurrences with the same regimen used to treat the initial episode.